To Protect and Provide: The Real Duties of Government
A government worthy of trust guards our safety, dignity, and shared future.
Introduction: The Shrinking Idea of What Government Is For
For decades, Americans have been told that government can’t do much. That its only legitimate roles are to keep the peace, protect property, and otherwise stay out of the way. This idea has been repeated so often that many have come to accept it as truth. In this view, the best government is the smallest one, the least visible, the least ambitious, and the least involved. A government that is easy to control or extinguish under the thumb of the ruling class.
The consequences of this thinking are all around us. Infrastructure crumbles. Healthcare is unaffordable. Wages stagnate while costs rise. In many places, the only noticeable functions of government are the police, the military, and the tax collector. Public service has been reduced to enforcement without compassion. Provision has been reframed as waste, and protection has been narrowed to the use of force, rather than the defense of dignity, safety, or stability.
This is not the natural shape of government. It is the result of choices influenced by those who benefit most from a weakened public sector. Corporations and billionaires have spent decades promoting the idea that government is incompetent or dangerous, while lobbying politicians to quietly reshape it to serve their own interests.
The truth is that a government worthy of trust must do more than enforce rules. It must protect the people from harm. Economic, environmental, structural, and social. And it must provide the foundations that allow individuals, families, and communities to thrive.
Protection and provision are not acts of charity. They are the basic duties of a free and moral society. They are what allow people to live beyond fear or survival, with the freedom, dignity, and possibility of a better future. A government that refuses to protect and provide abandons the very reason it exists.
What It Means to Protect
When people hear the word “protection” from government, they often think of the police or the military. These institutions are certainly a vital part of the picture, but they are only a fraction of what protection truly requires. Safety from violence is important, but safety from physical violence alone is not enough to build a secure or dignified life.
Protection also means economic security. People need wages that cover the cost of living, housing that is stable and affordable, healthcare that is accessible, and an economic environment that does not reward fraud and exploitation. When people live in constant fear of eviction, bankruptcy, or job loss, they are not safe or free. They are vulnerable. A steward government sees that and acts to protect against it.
Protection also means environmental safety. Clean air, safe drinking water, and a stable climate are not luxuries. They are preconditions for life. Government has a duty to defend the public from pollution, environmental destruction, and climate-driven disasters. It has a responsibility to help communities prepare for and adapt to the changes already underway.
In the modern world, data and digital rights must be treated as a part of public safety. People deserve protection from surveillance, manipulation, and exploitation in the digital sphere. As platforms and algorithms grow in power, so does the potential for harm. Government cannot ignore these risks. It must act as a defender of individual rights in both physical and digital space.
Public health is another essential domain of protection. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed just how much damage can be done when health systems are unprepared and under-resourced. Mental health crises, addiction, and chronic illness also demand attention and care. A government that protects its people must be ready to respond and to prevent.
Finally, protection includes emergency management. Natural disasters, industrial accidents, and large-scale emergencies require infrastructure and rapid response. That work cannot be left to chance or private interests. It is a core responsibility of public leadership.
The duty to protect is broad because the threats people face are broad. Real protection means guarding people from more than just crime. There is a duty to protect the people from the many ways a life can be upended when the systems meant to defend it are missing or hollowed out.
Next Week’s Article Preview
Protection from Power: Autonomy, Stability, and the Limits of Authority
Get it directly to your inbox subscribe for free through The Steward’s Compass Substack.
What It Means to Provide
To provide is not to patronize. Provision is not about charity or control. It is about building and maintaining the shared infrastructure of a thriving society. A good government does not simply prevent harm. It creates the conditions in which people can live, grow, and contribute with stability and dignity.
Provision means investing in public education. Beyond basic schooling, with strong, well-funded systems that prepare young people to think critically, participate fully, and find meaningful work. A society that abandons its schools is a society that abandons its future.
It means maintaining roads, public transit, and broadband infrastructure that connects communities and makes opportunity accessible. People cannot contribute to society if they cannot get to work, access services or connect to the modern economy. These are not luxuries. They are necessities for full participation.
It means ensuring that civic institutions and services, like courts, the DMV, and city hall, are functional, fair, and accessible. Bureaucracy should not be a barrier to basic rights or daily needs. A functioning civic infrastructure is a quiet, invisible form of freedom. When it works impartially, life moves forward. When it doesn’t, people suffer.
Provision also includes social safety nets that catch people when life breaks down. Unemployment support, food programs, disability assistance, and housing aid are not signs of weakness. They are signs of a society that refuses to let people fall through the cracks. They stabilize lives, families, and entire communities when they fall victim to circumstances or the dispassionate impacts of corporate decisions.
These are not giveaways. They are investments in human potential and social cohesion. Every dollar spent keeping a child in school, a worker on their feet, or a family in their home is a dollar that returns value to the economy, public safety, and a society of freedom. Provision is not a burden. It is the work of a society that intends to last and may be proud to be judged by the lives of all its people.
Government has a duty to provide on a scale that only it can, not because people are helpless, but because no individual can build a society alone.
Protection and Provision as Moral Commitments
At its core, government is not just a mechanism for managing society. It is a moral institution. To govern is to accept responsibility for the well-being of others. That is the essence of stewardship. The duty to protect and the duty to provide are not competing ideologies. They are moral commitments rooted in the same principle: to safeguard the vulnerable and invest in the whole of society.
This vision draws from a long tradition of moral clarity in public life. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. reminded us that the measure of a society is not how it treats the powerful, but how it treats those with the least power. A government’s legitimacy rests not in its efficiency or rhetoric, but in its willingness to stand with those who are most exposed to harm, instability, and injustice.
This is a direct challenge to the extractive models of governance and economics. Models that treat the public as a resource to be mined for labor, money, and obedience, while offering little in return. A government that demands everything and delivers nothing is not fulfilling its duty. It is breaking faith.
Protection and provision are the ways that faith is restored. They are not optional functions. They are the work. When government resists the pull of extraction economics and commits to care, it becomes worthy of trust. It becomes a partner in people’s lives, rather than an intrusive presence.
In a time of widespread disillusionment, these commitments matter more than ever. They are how a steward government earns and keeps its legitimacy. Not through fear or force. Through fidelity to the people it serves.
Failures of Care: When Government Abandons Stewardship
When government fails to protect and provide, the results are not theoretical. They are lived, measurable, and often devastating. Harms that did not need to happen.
The Flint water crisis stands as one of the clearest examples. In a cost-cutting move, officials switched the city’s water supply without proper safeguards. Working class residents were exposed to lead contamination for months while officials denied, deflected, and delayed. This was not just a failure of physical infrastructure. It was a failure of care, trust, and duty. A steward government would find it morally impossible to treat its people as expendable.
The COVID-19 pandemic revealed deep inequities in the public health system. Low-income communities and essential workers bore the brunt of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. While billionaires gained wealth, everyday people lost loved ones, livelihoods, and homes. In many places, basic protections were politicized or abandoned altogether. Government’s role was reduced to managing optics rather than protecting life.
Deregulation disasters have also left scars. The housing market, once treated as a shared human need and home ownership as an obvious, inevitable milestone in a successful American life, was handed over to speculative interests. Rail safety and environmental protections were weakened in the name of efficiency, resulting in toxic derailments and unsafe conditions. In each case, government ceded its responsibility to private interests, and people paid the price.
These failures do more than cause direct harm; they create broken trust that is hard to rebuild. People begin to believe the narrative that no one is looking out for them. That institutions are rigged or indifferent. This sense of abandonment fuels extremism, deepens hopelessness, and pushes many to disengage or despair.
Good governance, once broken, cannot be restored by words alone. It must be rebuilt through consistent action and visible care. When government fails repeatedly in its duties, the damage is not only policy failure. It is a fatal civic injury.
The Politics of Neglect vs. the Politics of Care
Neglect is not passive. It is a political decision. When governments fail to defend against housing profiteering, allow schools to decay, and defund a community’s only hospital, they are choosing to sacrifice public interest. That choice reshapes the country.
This is how civic erosion begins. When institutions stop showing up for people, people stop believing in those institutions. Trust declines. Participation drops. Cynicism spreads. The ground is cleared for authoritarianism and resentment to grow. In that vacuum, people are told to fend for themselves while the powerful write rules in their own interest.
The alternative is a politics of care. Stewardship demands more than bold promises or slogans. It requires daily, deliberate acts of maintenance, upkeep, and renewal. Good governance means fixing what breaks, tending to what matters, and preparing for what’s ahead.
It means investing in more than new programs. It means investing in resilient systems that sustain life over time. It means taking responsibility for roads, bridges, schools, courthouses, parks, and libraries. These are not symbols to be named after billionaire donors, corrupt corporations, or apathetic political figures. These are the real tools of public well-being. When leaders care for what is shared, people begin to believe again that public things are worth building and protecting.
Neglect wears down the fabric of representative democracy. Care weaves it back together.
What a Steward-Government Might Look Like
A government shaped by stewardship would not wait for collapse before acting. It would practice proactive public policy. Identify risks early, maintain what works, and fix what is failing before harm spreads. Prevention would matter as much as response.
Stewardship would also mean building universal protections with room for local flexibility. Everyone should have access to basic guarantees, an American Living Standard: clean air and water, education, healthcare, safety, and opportunity. And the way those protections are delivered should reflect the needs and ingenuity of each community. Stewardship listens first, then designs accordingly.
It would carry a bias toward inclusion and accessibility. That means lowering barriers, expanding access, and designing systems around the people who interact with them, rather than the convenience of bureaucracy. From disability access to rural outreach to language options, the goal is always the same: make government usable, visible, and trustworthy.
Most importantly, a stewardship government would show care in systems design. It would treat people like citizens, not cases. Like neighbors, not nuisances. Every process, from applying for aid to renewing a license to filling a complaint, would be crafted with dignity and clarity. Reducing friction isn’t just about efficiency. It is about respect.
This is not a dream. It is a shift in priorities. Stewardship turns government from a source of frustration into a source of reliability. From something that only shows up in a crisis to something that shows up every day, performing its job.
Closing: The Civic Covenant
The heart of stewardship is a relationship. A shared responsibility between the public and those chosen to lead. This is the Civic Covenant. It is not a contract written in law, but a moral understanding: the government exists to protect and provide, and in return, the people hold it accountable through their voice, their vote, and their vigilance.
A steward does not act alone. A steward governs with the people in mind, and often with the people at their side. The public, in turn, must expect more than slogans or survival. They must expect care. They must demand competence. They must treat leadership not as a spectacle, but as a service.
Communities thrive when this covenant is honored. When leaders do more than enforce, they uplift, and systems are designed to support rather than control. The business of government becomes building a good life for all.
To protect and to provide are not fringe ideas of optional extras. They are the foundation of a government worthy of trust. They are the duties that bind the steward to the people, and the people to one another.
The Civic Covenant begins with a simple promise: that we are in this together, and that the role of power is to serve that togetherness, not to exploit it, not to ignore it, and never to abandon it.